Just this past week, I had the opportunity to update my retirement account contribution through my employer’s plan. Included in the glossy brochure that explained all the new features and investment products available to me was a quiz. You probably know the one- it has a series of questions that assess your tolerance for riskiness in your retirement investment portfolio. I bring this up because in the 3 years that I’ve been a Program Manager at NineSigma, I’ve seen many clients and potential clients with a broad range of risk tolerances when it comes to Open Innovation (OI). Yes, many of our clients are Fortune 500 companies, and Wikipedia defines middle market companies as “those with revenues generally between USD$100 million and USD$1 billion per year.” Some of you might assume that a big company with annual revenue of $1 billion plus might have higher tolerance than a smaller company for spending money on OI, for opening up to new suppliers and development partners, or simply for participating in a process that can sometimes bring in completely unexpected results.  Do the Fortune 500 have more resources to wade through and vet potential solutions, and to engage with and fund new solution providers? Maybe, but my experience has been that it’s really a matter of comfort with the unknown that drives “success” in the application of OI in any organization- no matter what the annual revenue is.

Big companies and small can face challenges and road blocks as they try to improve processes, reduce costs, enter new markets, and drive products to market faster than their competitors.  Addressing these issues might mean that a company asks an OI intermediary like NineSigma to conduct a search for a partner with a very specific set of design/development/manufacturing capabilities, for an experts group to act as an advisory panel for a new market, for technical and business intelligence in a clearly defined technology arena, for co-development partners for a new product, for a novel technology that will improve an internal process, or for a toll manufacturer or material supplier. Bottom line is that we see needs of all types across companies of various sizes. Open Innovation intermediaries can give you access to people, technologies, and geographies that you might not be able to reach on your own, even if you do have the internal resources for an extensive scouting group. The Fortune 500 may run multiple NineSigma projects and a smaller company might run one or two a year, but the process we use, and the support we provide, is the same and applies equally well. Depending on your openness to new ways of looking at and solving challenges, OI could be a nice addition to your middle market company’s  “investment” portfolio.

The technical and popular press have devoted a great deal of attention to open innovation, and the concept of being "open", in recent years. It is undoubtedly the way all companies are headed, to varying degrees. I wanted to touch on the concept of Openness, and how I have come to view it.

Prior to launching an open innovation program, the leadership team should do a quick check of the organization’s degree of openness. Here I define openness within the context of open innovation across two dimensions. The first is the organization’s willingness to openly share information externally.  The second dimension is being open to embracing and acting on new, innovative ideas that are presented to the organization from the global innovation community.

For open innovation to be successful, organizations must be open to sharing their innovation needs with the global innovation community. It is hard for an external group to determine how they can offer effective help to an organization that will not share what it is seeking. Clearly, this does not mean sharing competitive or confidential information with the global innovation community. But, we see many organizations struggling with what they can share, when they can share it and how best to share. NineSigma’s Program Managers have worked with many organizations to help them answer these questions and to develop Briefs describing innovation needs that can be broadly shared with the global innovation community.

The second aspect of openness is the willingness of the organization to embrace and act on new, innovative ideas from outside the organization. Many times we see firms overcome the challenge of sharing what they seek - only to not follow up on what they find. Here the challenge is being open to ideas that did not originate within the firm. Some may refer to this as NIH, but many times it is more a matter of the firm’s reward systems and culture.

As the leadership team considers an open innovation program or initiative, they should take some time to assess the organization’s openness. The degree of openness will play a pivotal role in the overall success of the open innovation program. If the leadership team is concerned about openness then they should consider including a change management workstream in the open innovation program.