Aug 19

Is Open Innovation feasible for a Middle Market company?

by Stephanie Orellana
2 Comments » External Alliances | General Innovation | Vision

Just this past week, I had the opportunity to update my retirement account contribution through my employer’s plan. Included in the glossy brochure that explained all the new features and investment products available to me was a quiz. You probably know the one- it has a series of questions that assess your tolerance for riskiness in your retirement investment portfolio. I bring this up because in the 3 years that I’ve been a Program Manager at NineSigma, I’ve seen many clients and potential clients with a broad range of risk tolerances when it comes to Open Innovation (OI). Yes, many of our clients are Fortune 500 companies, and Wikipedia defines middle market companies as “those with revenues generally between USD$100 million and USD$1 billion per year.” Some of you might assume that a big company with annual revenue of $1 billion plus might have higher tolerance than a smaller company for spending money on OI, for opening up to new suppliers and development partners, or simply for participating in a process that can sometimes bring in completely unexpected results.  Do the Fortune 500 have more resources to wade through and vet potential solutions, and to engage with and fund new solution providers? Maybe, but my experience has been that it’s really a matter of comfort with the unknown that drives “success” in the application of OI in any organization- no matter what the annual revenue is.

 

Big companies and small can face challenges and road blocks as they try to improve processes, reduce costs, enter new markets, and drive products to market faster than their competitors.  Addressing these issues might mean that a company asks an OI intermediary like NineSigma to conduct a search for a partner with a very specific set of design/development/manufacturing capabilities, for an experts group to act as an advisory panel for a new market, for technical and business intelligence in a clearly defined technology arena, for co-development partners for a new product, for a novel technology that will improve an internal process, or for a toll manufacturer or material supplier. Bottom line is that we see needs of all types across companies of various sizes. Open Innovation intermediaries can give you access to people, technologies, and geographies that you might not be able to reach on your own, even if you do have the internal resources for an extensive scouting group. The Fortune 500 may run multiple NineSigma projects and a smaller company might run one or two a year, but the process we use, and the support we provide, is the same and applies equally well. Depending on your openness to new ways of looking at and solving challenges, OI could be a nice addition to your middle market company’s  “investment” portfolio.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan 11

R&D Spending Down, Innovation Output Up- Theoretical Humbug or Going Practice?

by Andy Zynga
No Comments » General Innovation | OI Community | Vision

Most of us would rather forget about the economic hardships of 2009. This must be particularly true for the Research and Development Community in the US which saw spending cuts of 3.8% according to a recent report by Battelle.  You would think that this must inevitably lead to a drop in Innovation Output, and that may be true for quite a few companies. However, there are a good many leading Innovators out there that have been able to buck this trend by collaborating more with external partners, using the principles of Open Innovation. In fact, Business Week in an article on 16 December wrote that (in 2009) “Open innovation spread far and wide as companies sought to offset cuts in their own R&D budgets by soliciting help from outsiders, including customers, suppliers, and freelance experts”.

Over the years, we have seen many companies achieve great results through collaborating with external partners, by “exnovating” if you will. This led NineSigma to invest in new services that allow companies not just to get access to the global Solution Provider community and the pertinent breakthrough solutions, but also to embed processes in their businesses by which they could set up and maintain their own Innovation Ecosystems.

We have gained many insights and learnings through our work with more than 100 leading, innovation-driven companies and want to share and discuss those insights with all of you. That’s why we have set up this Blog, and that’s why we are excited about this new way to communicate with you. We invite you to contribute, to critique, and to enjoy our “BLOINC”.

So here’s the first challenge for you as we start off this new year….we believe that “R&D Spending Down, Innovation Output Up” is a going practice AND here to stay. What’s more, we believe that Open Innovation is NOT just for incremental innovation, but also for breakthrough and disruptive innovation.

Tags: | | |